Fastest Point And Shoot

, guilt and irresponsibility, the dangers of common sense ethics


called me care deeply the new advertisement and decorative look our packs of cigarettes today. A cadaverous man, his face crushed by years of "guilt" and violation of the perfectibility of ethics and order. Tired eyes, damaged skin, oily hair, stains of sin in every line of his eyes. This reminded me that I read a small article written by Carla Cordua, which, I must humbly admit, was ahead of my desire of expression. He laughed quietly out of people-that is, common sense, the "people" - which, he felt his "health" damaged for years and years of cigarette between his lips (not with that portray the context in which these cigarettes were smoked, "pleasure, desire, hedonism, body, etc? -) had no other singular audacity to" blame "to the tobacco companies for not having warned in time. Is understandable. Nobody knows that smoking causes harm, or that McDonald's hamburgers have morbid obesity, or that the aircraft dropped, or that the talks involve risks irreparable surgeries, etc. And since no one "knows" is the total responsibility, in this case of tobacco, injury "offered." The human being is idiot, naive and irresponsible. It can not therefore answer for himself or for his own actions that affect her body and gray land dust.
chance in the game releases a catastrophic roll of the dice. And the players played their knots himself (by chance) look their best qualities to promote the uncertain fate of the final outcome, victory or defeat. The loss goes deep. Blame it on the other. No liability whatsoever in their decisions, in the small and infinitesimal moment where the next step took "life." As the poor and unfortunate gentleman, who had smoked for 55 years, walked by as bar had visited so many women who lost count, enjoyed a cigarette after another, from one sip after another, while his body suffered his passion. Sad knight, no no responsibility for their actions. Naive man, in one of his last vital forces, seeks to accuse, blame your bad, looking to be part of public opinion, taking out his case against the light. But something twisted the invisible hand of the eyes, as that player, look low, leaving the field, while a silent speech, the quietest of all, endlessly repeats that he is responsible for the fall, While some colleagues uncontrolled talk of arbitration, and some unsuccessful bills that conditioned defeat. Luis Felipe Oyarzun



pd mountains. nobody knows that kills snuff, but we all know that snakes talk, especially in paradise.

Kidney Infection How Long Should I Take Off Work?

on the prior statistics.

My father always said that Argentines "are good for after." A point is. They can do a party programs for the future that lasts even more than the same game. And in the preview where they begin to play the first few letters of an absurd and eternal struggle to control the future, to predict the future.
are reviewed again and again training for the teams, putting even greater emphasis on absences than presences. Negativity (which is not going to be) the perfect fit for the game "could be - could have been - shall" because it is the essence of speculation and the unfinished face an unavoidable truth: the party will end at some point and have an outcome that never changed.
What happened was not what the party can continue talking (imagine what it was not) even days after it ended. Then come
interviews, they really are nothing more than a couple of questions to pass players and coaches from coming down from the bus and go to dressing rooms. "How do you feel? What do you think the team?" questions will be repeated again and again and always have an answer "type" by the interviewee. Just as a recipe that turns to cook every weekend. Expected in these interviews that there is something that allows advance a result, some "Data" as in horse racing, but always the same, and unless someone is injured from the bus and enter the court, seldom takes radically something that makes the future.
After starting the statistics. Usually comiezan to say before the teams enter the stadium, and continue to say throughout the whole game.
The statistic is perhaps the grossest thing to do with football. It is only the technocratic result of the collection of the most diverse types of information and measurement imaginable. As most of you say out there, "the statistics are to be broken." Nothing close to reality, each new game is a new fact, a new number, a new source of data to be stored and re-commented on the cold numerical expressions for the next opportunity.
The biggest fallacy is claiming that a conviction statistics in a game outcome, to the point that not worth seeing, just calculate it.
prophetic Cravings football journalists do not end here: as you go the second time (I've even seen fresh as they do in the first) start talking to "the party is doomed" or "closed." As if it could happen just as if we had been able to master the future, to monitor the progress. As if you could not turn into ten minutes a final was lost 3-1.

Finally, the circus of the prior statistics are a crude way to deceive ourselves as human beings, of trying to control what we can not control, of trying to occupy the space of a God dead and rotting, sticks to give journalists sports. José Manuel Ferreiro